Printable version of this page (click <ctrl>+P, or use your browser's print function)
Contents
The content, completion, timeliness and accuracy of medical record documentation has a direct impact on the evaluation of the quality of assessment, planning and delivery of quality services. Documentation has a universal effect on organizational operation, evaluation of care and services, compliance, reimbursement, and survey compliance. The quality and type of care and services delivered to the resident are determined in part through documentation. On-going planning and assessment rely heavily on the quality and accuracy of the documentation in the chart. The medical record is also used to serve as a source document for legal proceedings.
Proactive concurrent monitoring of the completion, timeliness and accuracy of the medical record documentation is critical. Both the need for good documentation and risk factors hindering quality, support the importance of on-going, scheduled audits and monitoring for every resident’s medical record. Some of the alerts and quality assurance monitors may be included in the clinical and administrative software used. The quality monitoring process will focus on the combination of using manual and computerized clinical and billing data as well as standards/requirements.
Establishing the qualitative and quantitative monitoring process is expected to be tailored to the facility, their needs, the services they provide, workflow issues at the facility, survey findings and overall management of the facility. The monitoring process will not remain static but will move from focus to focus based on the Quality Assurance model of the facility..
Internal Qualitative vs. Quantitative Audits and Monitoring
There are various types of audits/ monitoring systems” – qualitative, quantitative and self monitoring including manual and automated methods. Qualitative audits look at the quality of documentation assessing adherence to clinical practice guidelines, evaluating consistency in charting, and adherence to regulations, standards and interpretations. This type of audit is usually completed by a staff member or consultant who has professional training, education or experience. Qualitative audits adhere to the standards of practice, qualitative resident care protocols both internal and those prescribed by the regulatory agencies. Qualitative protocols include increased knowledge and skills of the reviewer to evaluate documentation that focuses on the clinical practice and standards. The results or findings from the qualitative monitoring provide the data for quality assurance reviews of the quality of care in relationship to the standards, clinical practices and the regulatory requirements.
Facility staff can be trained and internal systems can be established for self-monitoring to complete quantitative audits which focus on whether a document is complete (all sections of a form), authenticated, or timely. This type of audit is more objective than a qualitative audit.
Increased self –reliance and self-monitoring is within the reach of the clinical staff documenting using the following methods:
- Self-audting, before you put the pen down look for those clinical interventions, observations or assessment that would demonstrate the quality of care you just provided or planning for the future
- Look at the automated edits or warning/alerts for inconsistencies of documentation based on the software criteria
- Set an expectation to periodically run reports to identify areas of deficiencies or information to evaluate the documentation, examples, un-noted orders report, alerts for individuals – to check against the charting planned or just completed
- Establish shift to shift or person to person monitoring of documentation with a “sign-off” either manual/or electronic to indicate self-monitoring. Some examples are medication and treatment, ADL monitoring, “
On an on-going basis, facilities should have quantitative and qualitative monitoring in place to assure complete and timely records. Admission, concurrent and discharge record monitoring assures that analysis is completed throughout the residents stay. The goal to continuous monitoring throughout a residents stay is to identify problems or omissions when correction is possible. Analyzing the record on discharge makes it virtually impossible to legally and ethically address or correct documentation problems when it can still impact the resident during their stay while maintaining the integrity of the medical record. For example, if an assessment is not completed on admission nothing can be done on discharge, but if it is found during an admission audit the assessment can still be completed in order for the facility to provide appropriate care and services for the resident. Signatures for manual systems shall meet the requirements for a full signature, initials that are referenced by the clinician’s full name including title or via the use of an electronic signature that is defined by the eHR standards.
External Qualitative and Quantitative Audits
Audits of health record information may be performed for the licensing and certification process, for legal reviews from licensing boards and for billing reviews.
Assessing the Quality of Documentation
When completing a qualitative audit, the reviewer should have the ability to assess the following issues, identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide suggestions to correct future documentation discrepancies.
A health information consultant should have the ability to provide a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the documentation content of the medical record, identify potential workflow issues and provide feedback and suggestions for resolution.
Routine Audits/Monitoring (Criteria and Timeframes)
Every long term care facility should have systems in place for monitoring completion of their documentation on an on-going basis. At a minimum, records should be reviewed on admission and hospital return, concurrently on a monthly/quarterly basis, and upon discharge/death. Not all audit findings will be correctable. For findings that cannot be corrected, the information should be gathered for training/retraining, system evaluation and improvement. The Quality Assurance process should incorporate the findings into their overall quality management program.
The criteria in the following table can be used to develop and tailor audit and monitoring tools.
Quantitative Monitoring |
Qualitative Monitoring | |
Admit/Return first 24 hours |
|
Physician Orders:
|
Admit/Return 24 – 48 hours |
|
|
Admit/Return 14-21 days |
|
|
RAI Process |
The RAI process should be audited by someone independent of the process to assure compliance with completion and timeliness timeframes. Recommend auditing each MDS (OBRA/Regulatory and PPS).
Significant Change
Readmissions
Abbreviated Assessment
MDS Corrections
|
|
MDS Validation Reports |
|
|
Concurrent or Quarterly |
All flowsheets and MAR/TARs have resident name, MR#, month and year identified on every page.
|
|
|
|
|
Resident Transferred to ER or Acute |
|
|
Discharge Analysis |
DEATH ONLY:
|
|
Privacy and Security |
|
Focus Audits and Monitoring Systems
There are other beneficial audit and monitoring systems, many of which should be in place on an on-going basis. Focus audits should be implemented based on the needs and issues of a facility. The following table lists the common monitoring and focus audits found in long term care facilities.
Quantitative Monitoring Criteria | Qualitative Monitoring Criteria | |
Acute Problems/24 Hour Board (completed daily) |
Review the 24 hour log, Nursing identify new orders via computer, alert log or other system reflective of the computer system. For each resident and problem identified check to see if corresponding documentation was completed such as nurses note, monitoring record, physician, family, resident notifications, CP upgrade, etc. |
Not only verify that the documentation was done, but also analyze what was documented based on the condition. Does a note contain information applicable to the problem, should other issues been addressed referrals needed should the documentation have included an assessment or plan? Was plan updated as applicable? |
Weights |
Implement an on-going monitoring system when weights are recorded to note significant weight loss changes or there is a trend over time. |
If a significant weight loss or trend has occurred review the documentation content to determine if the assessment and plan are complete and appropriate and if referrals were approved. |
Physician Visits |
Monitoring system to assure that physician visits are made and documented every 30 days for the first three visits and then every 60 days thereafter. Assure dictation is returned if applicable. |
Content of the progress note addresses or supports resident issues. |
Physician Orders |
Reviewed and signed by the physician within specified time frame (30 or 60 days). |
Diagnosis can be associated with orders; Check for duplication of medications or treatments in treating a diagnosis. |
MAR/TAR |
Documentation completed at time of administration or within 24 hours if documentation omission occurs. |
Reason and results are documented for PRN administration. Self-monitoring identifies who assumed the med/tx documentation if manual, (sign on and off). eHR includes an edit/alert system to remind nurses to complete entries. |
Physical Restraints |
Assessment completed and reviewed/updated at least quarterly. Consent obtained from resident or responsible party. Physician order obtained. |
Reason for restraint is appropriate to justify use. |
Skin/Pressure Sore |
Assessment completed and reviewed/updated weekly until healed. |
Documentation shows improvement or modification of plan if no improvement and follows the criteria for survey guidance on this subject. |
Psychotropic, Antipsychotic, and Hypnotic Medication Use |
Assessment completed and reviewed/updated at least every 6 months. Physician order obtained. Consent obtained from resident o responsible party. |
Diagnosis associated with medication is listed in the federal regulations as appropriate. Continued justification for administration of medication is documented. Annual dose reduction considerations are documented. |
Lab Result Monitoring |
Results of physician orders for all labs are in the medical record. |
Documentation reflects that abnormal lab results are communicated with physician. |
Integrating Audits/Monitoring into the QA/QI/QAPI Program
In order for an audit and monitoring program to be effective the data collected should be managed, analyzed, and reported. Findings from both focus audits/monitoring and on-going systems should be reported at the Quality Assurance Committee (QA) meeting. Trends or problem areas should be identified and action taken to correct the negative finding. Using a quality improvement process, the problems identified through the audit should be analyzed, causation factors identified , system evaluated, measures taken to correct the problem, and further monitoring to determine compliance.
It is recommended that audit findings are plotted or graphed over time to show potential negative trends, the result of improvement efforts, or results of on-going monitoring. Not every audit or monitoring criteria warrants reporting and graphing. Facility administration, health information practitioners and the QA committee should determine which audit criteria are appropriate for on-going reporting and graphing.
Role of HIM on the Quality Committee
HIM staff should be a permanent member of the Quality Committee responsible to routinely present results of qualitative and quantitative documentation audits and trending reports of the results. HIM may lead the quality function.
It is critical that the health information coordinator/manager actively participates in the Quality Assurance Committee and process. Once on-going audit and monitoring processes are established, there is a system in place that can be adapted to the changing needs of the facility. For example, if a potential problem area is identified on the quality indicator report, the audit tools can be adapted to monitor related documentation issues as one method to analyze a possible problem. The elements of an effective audit and quality monitoring system include flexibility to adapt to the changing needs of the facility, formal reporting and correction methods, and administrative acknowledgement of the importance of proactive monitoring systems.
Other duties of HIM staff on the Quality Committee are listed as follows:
If checklists are placed on the chart, it is acceptable to leave them on the record, but only for the timeframe defined on the tool and then it should be removed (eg. An admission checklist that is completed by day 7 should be removed right after the 7th day). It is not recommended the audit forms be left in the chart even discharge audit tools.
The retention policies for the facility should define how long audits, checklists, and monitoring records should be retained based on the need and further use for the information. Generally, once the tool is completed and the findings are used for statistical analysis where applicable, the checklists/audit forms can be destroyed. If an audit is used in conjunction with a survey correction plan or monitoring a quality indicator, adjust the retention schedule appropriately.
Auditing the Electronic Health Record
When transitioning from a paper record to a hybrid record (part paper, part electronic) to an electronic record (paperless), care must be taken to carefully plan an electronic record keeping system that permits performance improvement monitoring as part of an overall system that also supports performance of other required HIM functions. The Health Information Consultant and designee should be involved throughout the planning process to give practical input from an HIM standpoint. Many of the audits can be used to determine edits and alerts within the documentation system.
When you already have an EHR or partial EHR (or if you are planning an EHR) the following should be considered:
What are the outcomes or expectations from the facility for monitoring documentation?
Determine which data elements that match the quality indicators and the criteria for evaluating each of these items.
What reports do you now have and what reports can be written?
If an error is found in the EHR how do you correct? How do you flag, close, amend and append information. Example: Entered in error and reference the document, date and time.
Error reports are prepared for follow up; what, who.
Assignment of follow up and monitoring, correction process in place.
Method of electronic signatures, what system will be used?
Will you use an EHR from a computer based system, integration of a document management system, downloading documents such as word/excel, faxed and other documents from other organizations.
How will you identify records in a variety of databases, can these databases be integrated or do you need to go to different programs to find the information.
Data entry vs. double entry. When do you have this occur? Consider getting different modules of different systems integrated vs. replacing an entire system.
Is it possible to redesign forms that eliminate some narrative charting using check boxes instead? Could part or all of a qualitative audit be done using edits or alerts for some parts of the record?
Audit trail of which entered data vs. the acces/security grid identifies the persons who access or enter data are equal to the authorizations.
Identify tables, menus that can be modified both for documentation and for monitoring.
Reminders, calendaring, assignments, use any notifications that are in the system, look at notifications when the staff sign on if something is due, saves auditing.
Protocols established for documentation, ask questions re: areas not completed that are high priority are identified as required fields/data.
Can quantitative audits be done by using a series of edits? For example, when a signature is missing on a med sheet, when the nurse attempts to sign off at the end of the shift an error report is created prompting to go back and correct the omission.
Can reports be created using electronic auditing that could also be used to trend data suitable for use in the QI process?
As parts of the record change from paper to electronic format, so should the policies and procedures relating to documentation monitoring. The health information consultant and health information designee will need to be trained on how to access information for auditing and their computer access privileges and restrictions updated to reflect the process changes as the record becomes entirely paperless.
External Audits
Preparation is the key to having a successful outcome to an external audit. Skilled Nursing Facilities are or may be subject to a number of audits by outside agencies including Licensing and Certification, the OIG (for Corporate Compliance and HIPAA Privacy enforcement), CMS (for HIPAA Security enforcement), a Fiscal Intermediary or other Insurer (Medical review to support billing) or perhaps by the facility’s corporation for compliance reviews.
Use a team effort to prepare your responses to each type of review. Knowing what documentation will be needed, where to get it and how to present it to the surveyor or auditor is critical. Training staff on what to retrieve and how to retrieve and presenting it to the surveyor or auditor is an important part of managing the survey or audit process.
Use screen prints to provide instructions on how to retrieve electronic data and how to locate other types of data.
Train a number of staff members on how to work with a surveyor or auditor in order to make the process as smooth as possible.
Use your annual survey, quality indicators, corporate compliance surveys, Quality Assurance Data, monitor trending results, Consultant Reports and Medical Review (Billing) Request Log, etc. to guide you in determining what your problems have been in the past, what your plans of corrections were and what progress you have made in correcting those issues.
Use a survey preparation checklist to make ensure that all required documentation is ready for the survey entrance conference.
The HIM Department may be responsible for printing the HCFA-802 Resident Roster/Sample matrix and the HCFA-672 Resident Census and Conditions. The HIM Director as well as at least one other designated person should be familiar with how to produce these reports on demand.
Have a matrix of which forms are maintained electronically and which are on paper when using a hybrid record. The chart should have a notation that specific documentation is maintained electronically.
Certificates of destruction of records and DHS permission to file records offsite should be available.
The HIM Policy and Procedure Manual should be available and up to date
Develop a grid that lists the types of possible audits or surveys, a listing of what supporting documentation will be required during the survey or audit and a reference to the location of that documentation.
HIM Standard:
Copyright ©2011 American Health Information Management Association. All rights reserved. All contents, including images and graphics, on this Web site are copyrighted by AHIMA unless otherwise noted. You must obtain permission to reproduce any information, graphics, or images from this site. You do not need to obtain permission to cite, reference, or briefly quote this material as long as proper citation of the source of the information is made. Please contact Publications to obtain permission. Please include the title and URL of the content you wish to reprint in your request.